Note 7: Provision for Income Taxes
| (In millions) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | |||
| Current tax expense | $ 2,230 | $ 1,849 | $ 2,797 |
| Deferred tax expense (benefit) from temporary differences | 564 | 703 | (119) |
| 2,794 | 2,552 | 2,678 | |
| GECS | |||
| Current tax expense | 1,277 | 391 | 2,090 |
| Deferred tax expense (benefit) from temporary differences | 59 | 1,007 | (944) |
| 1,336 | 1,398 | 1,146 | |
| CONSOLIDATED | |||
| Current tax expense | 3,507 | 2,240 | 4,887 |
| Deferred tax expense (benefit) from temporary differences | 623 | 1,710 | (1,063) |
| Total | $ 4,130 | $ 3,950 | $ 3,824 |
GE and GECS file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. The GECS provision for current tax expense includes its effect on the consolidated return.
Consolidated U.S. earnings from continuing operations before income taxes were $8,840 million in 2007, $9,954 million in 2006 and $10,296 million in 2005. The corresponding amounts for non-U.S.-based operations were $17,758 million in 2007, $13,376 million in 2006 and $10,882 million in 2005.
Consolidated current tax expense includes amounts applicable to U.S. federal income taxes of $87 million, $514 million and $2,755 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and amounts applicable to non-U.S. jurisdictions of $3,029 million, $1,500 million and $1,910 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Consolidated deferred taxes related to U.S. federal income taxes were expenses of $769 million and $1,544 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, and a benefit of $238 million in 2005.
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases, as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax deductions by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies. To the extent we do not consider it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, a valuation allowance is established. See note 20.
Our businesses are subject to a wide variety of U.S. federal, state and foreign tax laws and regulations. Changes to these laws or regulations may affect our tax liability, return on investments and business operations. For example, GE’s effective tax rate is reduced because active business income earned and indefinitely reinvested outside the United States is taxed at less than the U.S. rate. A significant portion of this reduction depends upon a provision of U.S. tax law that defers the imposition of U.S. tax on certain active financial services income until that income is repatriated to the United States as a dividend. This provision is consistent with international tax norms and permits U.S. financial services companies to compete more effectively with foreign banks and other foreign financial institutions in global markets. This provision, which is scheduled to expire at the end of 2008, has been scheduled to expire on four previous occasions, and each time it has been extended by Congress. If this provision is not extended, the current U.S. tax imposed on active financial services income earned outside the United States would increase, making it more difficult for U.S. financial services companies to compete in global markets. If this provision were not extended, we expect our effective tax rate to increase after 2010.
We have not provided U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies that have been reinvested indefinitely. These earnings relate to ongoing operations and, at December 31, 2007, were approximately $62 billion. Because of the availability of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not reinvested indefinitely. Deferred taxes are provided for earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies when we plan to remit those earnings.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) allowed U.S. companies a one-time opportunity to repatriate non-U.S. earnings through 2005 at a 5.25% rate of tax rather than the normal U.S. tax rate of 35%, provided that certain criteria, including qualified U.S. reinvestment of those earnings, were met. Available U.S. foreign tax credits related to the repatriation are reduced under provisions of the Act. Because the vast majority of our non-U.S. earnings have been permanently reinvested in active business operations, we repatriated only $1.2 billion of non-U.S. earnings. Because a U.S. tax provision at normal tax rates had been provided on the majority of this amount, the result was a reduction of the 2005 consolidated tax rates of approximately 0.5 percentage points.
As discussed in note 1, on January 1, 2007, we adopted a new accounting standard, FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, resulting in a $49 million decrease in retained earnings, a $89 million decrease in goodwill and a $40 million decrease in income tax liability.
Annually, we file over 6,500 income tax returns in over 250 global taxing jurisdictions. We are under examination or engaged in tax litigation in many of these jurisdictions. During 2007, the IRS completed the audit of our consolidated U.S. income tax returns for 2000 – 2002. The IRS is currently auditing our consolidated U.S. income tax returns for 2003 – 2005. In addition, certain other U.S. tax deficiency issues and refund claims for previous years remain unresolved. It is reasonably possible that the 2003 – 2005 U.S. audit cycle will be completed during the next 12 months, which could result in a decrease in our balance of “unrecognized tax benefits” — that is, the aggregate tax effect of differences between tax return positions and the benefits recognized in our financial statements. We believe that there are no other jurisdictions in which the outcome of unresolved issues or claims is likely to be material to our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. We further believe that we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits, the amount of related interest and penalties we have provided and what we believe to be the range of reasonably possible changes in the next 12 months, were:
| 2007 | ||
|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | December 31 | January 1 |
|
(a) Some portion of such reduction might be reported as discontinued operations. |
||
| Unrecognized tax benefits | $ 6,331 | $ 6,806 |
| Portion that, if recognized, would reduce tax expense and effective tax rate(a) | 4,268 | 4,302 |
| Accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits | 923 | 1,281 |
| Accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits | 77 | 121 |
| Reasonably possible reduction to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in succeeding 12 months | 0 – 1,500 | 0 – 1,900 |
| Portion that, if recognized, would reduce tax expense and effective tax rate(a) | 0 – 1,250 | 0 – 900 |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
| (In millions) | 2007 |
|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, 2007 | $ 6,806 |
| Additions for tax positions of the current year | 434 |
| Additions for tax positions of prior years | 1,439 |
| Reductions for tax positions of prior years | (1,939) |
| Settlements with tax authorities | (330) |
| Expiration of the statute of limitations | (79) |
| Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ 6,331 |
We classify interest on tax deficiencies as interest expense; we classify income tax penalties as provision for income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2007, $(279) million of interest expense and $(34) million of tax expense related to penalties were recognized in the statement of operations.
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the actual income tax rate is provided below.
Reconciliation of U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to actual income tax rate
| Consolidated | GE | GECS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| U.S. federal statutory income tax rate | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Increase (reduction) in rate resulting from |
|||||||||
| Inclusion of after-tax earnings of GECS in before-tax earnings of GE | — | — | — | (17.2) | (16.4) | (15.7) | — | — | — |
| Tax on global activities including exports | (15.7) | (16.7) | (15.4) | (5.0) | (6.5) | (5.0) | (21.2) | (21.1) | (22.2) |
| U.S. business credits | (1.1) | (1.4) | (1.4) | (0.3) | (0.4) | (0.2) | (1.5) | (2.2) | (2.7) |
| SES transaction | (2.1) | — | — | — | — | — | (4.0) | — | — |
| All other — net | (0.6) | — | (0.1) | (1.4) | (0.1) | (0.7) | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 |
| (19.5) | (18.1) | (16.9) | (23.9) | (23.4) | (21.6) | (25.3) | (23.0) | (23.7) | |
| Actual income tax rate | 15.5% | 16.9% | 18.1% | 11.1% | 11.6% | 13.4% | 9.7% | 12.0% | 11.3% |